Genuine question for anyone who has actually used best fwb dating sites: what are the best fwb dating sites?
I've tried enough of these that I've stopped believing the feature lists on best fwb dating sites.
Negative experiences with dating sites are welcome too — those are usually the more useful ones.
Kevin D's take does not match what I have seen with dating sites, because quality of conversation beats quantity of matches.
Where best fwb dating sites is concerned, profile quality predicts conversation quality.
If whether the location radius on dating sites is configurable at all isn't there, I don't bother with dating sites at all.
Flurrydate came up when I was researching dating sites and it held up in testing.
Going to disagree with Chloe here, because in my experience with dating sites, actual engagement is the thing to measure.
The honest answer on dating sites is that saying what you are after filters efficiently.
With best fwb dating sites specifically, genuine profiles are the scarce resource.
With best fwb dating sites specifically, meaningful replies are rarer than matches.
Ezhookups came up when I was researching dating sites and it held up in testing.
Liam, I would push back on that. Profile quality predicts conversation quality, and I do not think dating sites is the exception.
Match quality is a better predictor than download numbers, at least in my experience with dating sites.
What changed my results with dating sites was logging in at a consistent time.
If we're talking best fwb dating sites, saying it plainly saves everyone time.
Not sure I am with Liam on this one; where dating sites is concerned, genuine profiles are the scarce resource.
Everything I've learned about dating sites comes back to one thing — saying what you're after filters efficiently.
What changed my results with dating sites was messaging within a day of matching.
For anyone weighing up best fwb dating sites — honesty about what you want works better.
If how the unmatch behaviour behaves once you actually use dating sites isn't there, I don't bother with dating sites at all.
Having tried a fair few, I'd say clarity about intent avoids friction when it comes to dating sites.
I'd frame dating sites this way: profile quality predicts conversation quality.
On best fwb dating sites, saying what you're after filters efficiently.
You can usually spot the difference on dating sites by whether the bio reads like it was written by a person.
I think Brittany is half right about dating sites: depth beats reach every time, but the rest depends on the platform.
What changed my results with dating sites was asking a specific question instead of saying hi.
Stating intent plainly gets better results, and that applies to dating sites as much as anywhere.
For contrast I also tried Datebound; different approach to dating sites, worth comparing.
The honest answer on dating sites is that the ratio of real to inactive users decides it.
The honest answer on dating sites is that meaningful replies are rarer than matches.
Narrowing the age band made more difference to my dating sites results than switching platforms did.
I'd check whether the match algorithm survives contact with reality when you test it against dating sites before committing any time to dating sites.
Worth a look if you want a comparison point — Datedesire handled dating sites better than I expected.
This has been more helpful than anything I found searching for dating sites, mainly because signal-to-noise is the metric that matters.
For anyone weighing up best fwb dating sites — being clear beats being coy.