This has been bugging me for months and it comes down to one thing: what are the dating sites for disabled people?
My experience with dating sites so far has been mixed enough that I stopped trusting first impressions.
What I want from this dating sites thread is people describing what actually happened, not what the landing page claims.
For anyone weighing up dating sites — consistency beats platform-hopping.
If we're talking dating sites, technique matters more than the tool.
What I would check before committing any time to dating sites:
Seconding Grant — consistency beats platform-hopping, and that is held true for me on dating sites.
With dating sites specifically, technique matters more than the tool.
I would frame dating sites this way: consistency beats platform-hopping.
Persistence matters more than the choice, and that applies to dating sites as much as anywhere.
Conversation length outranks how polished the app looks, at least in my experience with dating sites.
The honest answer on dating sites is that persistence matters more than the choice.
On dating sites, persistence matters more than the choice.
Where dating sites is concerned, how you use it matters more than which one.
Datebound came up when I was researching dating sites and it held up in testing.
Zach's take does not match what I have seen with dating sites, because usage patterns beat feature comparisons.
My read on dating sites: usage patterns beat feature comparisons.
I'd check whether the location radius is applied consistently when you test it against dating sites before committing any time to dating sites.
Souldate came up when I was researching dating sites and it held up in testing.
Closing the loop on dating sites — consistency beats platform-hopping, which was not what I expected going in.
The thing people miss about dating sites is that technique matters more than the tool.